About Us | What We Do | Methods and
Practices | Project Profiles Template-based,
governance,
Ever think about these questions?
Executives with governance and compliance responsibilities need good
answers to these questions. How
“Asymmetric Information” hides the truth about your IT
investments New and unforgiving Governance and
Compliance responsibilities make it more important than ever for non-IT
executives to get accurate, timely, detailed, and UNBIASED information
– the Unvarnished Truth – about the state of IT investments under
their watch. Too often, executives find themselves either in the dark
or forced to rely on “Asymmetric Information” – information
from developers, vendors, business sponsors, with a lot of pieces left out or
distorted, and a lot of self-interest attached. Most of those providing asymmetric information have an
understandable bias toward "Keep going." When jobs,
reputations, and revenue depend on continuing what may be a doomed or
worthless effort, it is not hard to predict what bad decisions can result. All
successful projects are alike. All failed projects fail in their own way. Superficial successes = Long-fuse failures Since the late 1960s, most Information
Technology projects – and investments – have failed to deliver
the value they had promised. This even
includes projects that come in on time, on or under budget, and with all
their planned functions working correctly.
These “Long-Fuse Failures” fail to add enough actual
business value to justify the time, effort and money invested in them. Managing in the “Yellow Zone” Hamilton Technology Management specializes in “Yellow Zone
Projects” – business/technology alignment projects that need
intervention to stay on course, or get back on course. A Yellow Zone
Project may be behind schedule, over budget, or experiencing other problems
that may be serious but not yet fatal.
A Yellow-Zone Project that delivers a superficially successful
solution based on an outdated business case is a Long-Fuse Failure in the
making. It gives the right answer to
the wrong problem. Asymmetric
Information – or a simple LACK of information – means that too many
Yellow-Zone Projects end up as Long-Fuse Failures. Compounding
the problem: unjustifiable costs and scarce
resources Compliance and technology governance resources: the cost crunch Some compliance and governance
engagements require large teams with a formal management layer and a lot of
support from the larger consulting organization. Most don’t. A typical compliance and governance
support engagement requires a single professional or a small team, either self-directed,
or client-led. For these engagements, the
markups that traditional consultancies add to the hourly rates of consulting
professionals increase compliance and governance costs, but add little or no justifying
value. Another cost crunch contributor? Documentation. Many executives make process documentation a low priority, but ultimately run into the "Pay me now, pay me MORE later" rule. Recent surveys have shown that updating, correcting, and otherwise cleaning up process documentation can account for over 50% of the total cost of governance and compliance. The resource crunch For executives with new, more stringent
responsibilities for governance and compliance, it has become harder, not
easier to find qualified resources. Full-time
resources with the skill and experience to perform governance and compliance
functions AND see past Asymmetric Information are hard to find. Resources who can fix the most critical
deficiencies through an efficient, effective, but also cost-cutting
operational model are even harder to find. Where Do
WE Come In? Hamilton Technology Management addresses
two problems for non-IT executives responsible for compliance and governance:
Contact Us |
|
|
|
Copyright Hamilton
Technology Management 2008 |